You have a geometry problem your CAD tools will not do. In three to four weeks you get a written verdict on whether it is solvable, the approach we would take, and what the full build would cost.
Who this is for
Engineering and R&D leads who already know what they need and cannot buy it off the shelf.
What you get
One document, four parts — all of it defensible in front of a budget holder.
A written feasibility verdict
Can it be done, and precisely where it breaks. A clear no, with the reason, is a valid and useful result.
The proposed approach
The algorithmic route, the trade-offs it forces, and the alternatives we rejected on the way.
Effort and cost for the full build
A range you can take to a budget holder, with the assumptions written down.
A worked fragment on your data
The hardest piece attempted for real, so the verdict rests on something we ran rather than something we think.
How it runs
Three to four weeks, start to verdict.
A 30-minute call
You show us the problem and the data. If it is not a fit, we say so here and it costs you nothing.
Three to four weeks of work
We work on your geometry and come back with questions as they come up, not at the end.
Verdict and walkthrough
You get the document, and a call to argue with it.
Why us
The problem underneath is always geometry that has to survive contact with a machine.
More than twenty projects across some ten sectors — medical, additive manufacturing, shipbuilding, architecture, CNC, jewellery.
Our Grasshopper plugins have been in use across the Rhino ecosystem for years. Try it before you talk to us. The parametric heatsink configurator runs in your browser, and the case studies show the same idea at production scale.
Grasshopper plugins
Our own web platforms